Nota Lepi. 43 2020: 301-309 | DOI 10.3897/nl.43.54177 Research Article A new Species and a new record of Pero Herrich-Schaffer, 1855 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in the Andes of southern Peru CARLOS PALACIOS!, JACKIE FARFAN!?, JOSE CERDENA!”, ANA LAzo-Rivera', Luis E. PARRA?, HECTOR A. VARGAS? 1 Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa, Escuela Profesional de Biologia, Av. Alcides Carrion s/n, Arequipa, Peru; cpalaciosc@unsa.edu.pe; jjackie4u@gmail.com; cerdenajoseal@yahoo.es; alazor@unsa.edu.pe 2 PPG Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociéncias, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gongalves, 9500, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil 3 Departamento de Zoologia, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanogrdficas, Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile; luparra@udec.cl 4 Departamento de Recursos Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Agronémicas, Universidad de Tarapacd, Casilla 6-D, Arica, Chile; lepvargas@gmail.com http://zoobank. org/96 12ED3A-2BEC-48B9-B325-2909F015B2BA Received 12 May 2020; accepted 4 August 2020; published: 6 October 2020 Subject Editor: Axel Hausmann. Abstract. Two species of the moth genus Pero Herrich-Schaffer, 1855 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae, Odontoperini) are added to the fauna of the Andes of southern Peru in the Arequipa Department. Pero lopezi Vargas & Palacios sp. nov. is described and illustrated based on male adults collected in Pocsi, at 2900 m elevation. Pero atridisca Dognin, 1906, previously known from Angasmarca (La Libertad), 1s recorded for the first time in Arequipa, significantly expanding its distribution range. Introduction The genus Pero Herrich-Schaffer, 1855 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae, Odontoperini) is rep- resented by 313 described species, 294 in the Neotropics and 19 in the Nearctic region (Poole 1987; Herbulot 2002; Pitkin 2002; Ferris 2003; Lévéque 2006, 2007, 2010; Brown 2007; Vargas 2007). The list includes the two species previously ascribed to the Neotropical Nepitia Walker, 1866, a genus recently synonymized with Pero based on a molecular phylogenetic study that also provided support for the synonymy of Azelinini with Odontoperini (Brehm et al. 2019). South American species of Pero are mostly associated with Andean habitats, from mid-elevation eastern wet forest to xerophytic scrub- land of western slopes, and with southeastern Brazilian habitats (Poole 1987; Lévéque 2007; Vargas 2007; Cerdefia et al. 2019). Faunistic studies have revealed high diversity of Pero in moist forest of the Andes (Brehm et al. 2016). Almost all of the currently recognized species of Pero distributed in Peru come from the northern and central Andes (Poole 1987; Herbulot 2002; Lévéque 2007, 2010). The genus Pero is well diversified in the Andes but only one species has been recently reported from Andean environments of southwestern Peru (Cerdefia et al. 2019). However, a few discover- ies dealing with this genus and other representatives of Geometridae in similar arid environments suggest that this poor representation is due more to a lack of data from low collection effort than to low diversity in this geographic area (Vargas and Hausmann 2008; Vargas et al. 2020). 302 Carvos Pavacios et al.: Additions to Pero in Arequipa The aims of this study are to further update the records of Pero species recently collected 1n the Department of Arequipa and to describe formally a new species of Pero, based on male specimens collected in the locality of Pocsi, at 2900 m elevation. Material and methods The specimens examined in this study were collected in different sites between about 2200 and 4100 m elevation in the Andes of the Arequipa Department, southern Peru, between September, 2017 and September, 2019, using two light traps, one with 250 watt mercury vapor mixed light and other with one LepiLed UV lamp (Brehm 2017). The collected specimens were mounted following standard procedures. Male genitalia were removed from abdomens and soaked in 10% KOH solu- tion for ten minutes. Subsequently, abdomens were preliminarily cleaned of soft tissue in water in order to expose the genital parts, then stained in Eosin Y to identify genital parts. Dissected genita- lia were cleaned of water using ethanol 90% and 95% solutions, and mounted in Euparal. Genitalic terminology follows Poole (1987). Length measurements are in metric units and were made from photographs of specimens taken next to a scale and magnified on a computer screen. Photographs of adults were taken with a Nikon D610 digital camera through a Nikkor 105 mm f/2.8G AF-S VR Micro lens; photographs of genitalia structures were taken with SMZ25 Nikon stereomicroscope. Images were assembled and edited in Photoshop CS5.1. Abbreviations of institutional collections MUSA _ Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa, Peru. Results Pero lopezi Vargas & Palacios, sp. nov. http://zoobank.org/43228DBB-7A 87-4767-9A4C-442F0ED7F 164 Figs 1, 2 Type material. Holotype, male: Peru. Peru, AR[equipa], Pocsi, Carretera Mollebaya-Pocsi, 16°30’56”S, 71°25’52”W, 2900 m, 17—24.111.2018, Leg. S. Ramos, M. Condori, M. Arivilca, L. Olivera (MUSA). BOLD specimen page BC ZSM Lep add 300. Paratypes, PERu, eight males. One male, same data as holotype, genitalia slide GeoAr01 (MUSA); six males, same data as holotype, but 03.11.2018, genitalia slide GeoAR13 (MUSA); one male Peru, AR[equipa], Chiguata, Bosque Polylepis sp., 16°23’33”S, 71°19°07”"W, 4090 m, 17—23.111.2018, Leg. L. Pinto, G. Aliaga, Y. Aguilar, G. Rodriguez, genitalia slide GeoArl1 (MUSA). Type locality. Peru, Arequipa Department, Pocsi, 16°30’S, 71°25’ W, 2900 m. Diagnosis. Pero lopezi is recognized by the slightly dentate postmedial line with outwardly rounded teeth on upperside of forewing (Fig. 1A), parallel-sided uncus with round apex and nar- row longitudinal subscaphium (Fig. 2A) and phallus with a serrated carina near apex (Fig. 2C). The morphology of the male genitalia of P. /opezi allows it to be assigned to Group 15 sensu Poole (1987), among which this is remarkably similar to that of Pero acopa Poole, 1987. However, P. lopezi is easily separable from the species in this group, including P. acopa, due to the slightly dentate postmedial line with outwardly rounded teeth on upperside of forewing, narrow longitudi- Nota Lepi. 43: 301-309 303 Figure 1. Adult stage of Pero /opezi Vargas & Palacios, sp. nov. A. Holotype male in dorsal view; B. Holotype male in ventral view. Scale bar: 1 cm. 304 Carvos Patacios ef al.: Additions to Pero in Arequipa phallus removed; B. Phallus in lateral view; C. Detail of serrated carina of phallus close to apex. Scale bar: 1 mm. nal subscaphium and phallus with a serrated carina near the apex. Moreover, the antennae of the male in P. acopa are pectinate, but not in P. Jopezi. Male. (Fig. 1) Forewing length 17-18 mm (n= 9) Head. Mostly greyish brown, some scales slightly darker or lighter subapically. Vertex with narrow, slightly elongated scales. Frons appressedly scaled. Antenna filiform, about 2/3 forewing length, dorsally with whitish brown scales, ventrally shortly ciliated. Labial palp greyish brown; first segment with narrow, elongated scales anteroventrally projected partially concealing the base of second segment; second segment with shorter scales; third segment appressedly scaled. Thorax. Mostly with narrow, elongated greyish brown scales dorsally, mostly with long, hair- like whitish greyish brown scales laterally. Legs mostly greyish brown with a few lighter and dark- er scales scattered. Forewing mostly greyish brown with dark brown scales scattered; antemedial line dark brown, mostly sinuate, sharply angled outward near costal margin; discal dot blackish brown, as a short transverse stripe near distal margin of cell; postmedial line broad, dark brown outwardly, lighter inwardly, slightly dentate with outwardly rounded teeth, a larger tooth near pos- terior margin; five small circular creamy white spots forming a line close to distal margin, each spot with a narrow dark brown stripe proximally. Hindwing mostly whitish brown basally, greyish brown distally, darker scales scattered; discal dot dark brown, circular; postmedial line slightly dentate, dark brown, lighter near anterior margin. Nota Lepi. 43: 301-309 305 Abdomen. Greyish brown with lighter and darker scales scattered. Segment VIII slightly scle- rotized, anterior margin broadly concave, lateral margin broadly convex, distal margin rounded. Male genitalia (Fig. 2). Tegumen narrow, anterior margin sharply cleft, posterior margin concave. Saccus narrow, U-shaped. Socius membranous with a few hair-like setae. Uncus main- ly parallel-sided, lightly wider basally, apex rounded. Subscaphium as a narrow, longitudinal rectangular sclerite. Gnathos Y-shaped; ventral arm about 2/3 the length of lateral arm, slightly curved posteriorly. Juxta in two parts, triangular basally, semicircular dorsally, lateral incision near middle, dorsal part slightly asymmetric, left apex narrower than right apex, dorsal margin slightly concave. Transtilla narrow near middle. Valvae symmetrical, somewhat rectangular, slightly wider basally, dorsal margin about a half of ventral margin; costa well-sclerotized until about 3/4 length of dorsal margin, about a third the height of valva, distal part suddenly nar- rowed; distal part of valva mainly membranous, costal fold with abundant hair-like setae; me- dian process well-developed, sculptured; distal half of sacculus as a narrow, longitudinal lobe with hair-like setae; a diagonal, slightly curved furrow from near middle of sacculus to near apex of costa. Phallus sub-cylindrical (Fig. 2B), similar in length to dorsal margin of valva, distal third suddenly excavated dorsally, a well-developed serrated carina ventrally near apex (Fig. 2C); vesica with a narrow, slightly sinuous cornutus basally and two groups of spine-like cornuti, one at middle, another at apex. Female. Unknown. Geographic distribution. (Fig. 4). Pero /opezi is only known from the type locality, Pocsi, in Arequipa Department, and surroundings, between 2900 and 4090 m elevation. Etymology. This new species is dedicated to Dr. Evaristo Luciano Lopez Tejeda, Director of Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional de San Agutin de Arequipa (MUSA), in recogni- tion of his invaluable work on the fauna of the Department of Arequipa and southern Peru. Host plant. Unknown. Remarks. Although identification of species of the genus Pero is mainly based on morphology of the male genitalia (Poole 1987), it has been suggested that structures of the female genitalia also provide useful characters for identifications of the species of this genus, including those of Group 15 (Lévéque 2006, 2007; Dias 2008; Vargas 2019). Females of P. /opezi were searched for, without success, in the type locality after we recognized the males as representatives of an undescribed species. Accordingly, further sampling will be needed to know this species better. Pero atridisca Dognin, 1906 Fig. 3A, B Material examined. PERU. Two males: Peru, AR[equipa], Valle Colca, Via Cabanaconde — Yaguar, 15°35’22”S, 72°00°06”W, 2200 m, 05.1x.2019, Leg. M. Condori, M. Arivilca, C. Palacios (MUSA). Remarks. Pero atridisca was described from Angasmarca, La Libertad Department, Peru. The discovery of this species in Arequipa expands its range south in the Andes more than 1000 km (Fig. 4). Adult and male genitalia were illustrated by Poole (1987). The species identity awaits further study and confirmation by molecular data (DNA barcoding). 306 Carvos Patacios et al.: Additions to Pero in Arequipa — B Figure 3. Adults (dorsal view) and male genitalia. A, B. Pero atridisca Dognin, 1906. Scale bar: 1 cm (A.); 1 mm (B.). Nota Lepi. 43: 301-309 307 81°0'0"W 78°0'0"W 75°0'0"W 72°0'0"W 69°0'0"W oak n n S > =] oOo ° ie] Ke} \o n n S > oS 1o ° ° fon fon) n n S 2 o Oo ie) ° “N AN —_— —_— n n © | > o ro e] is} Wy 2) _— :, — Yn 2 =) ie] ie.4] — 81°0 O"W 78°0'0"W 75°0' 0"W ) 72°0 o"W 69°0'0"W Figure 4. Geographic distribution of Pero Jopezi Vargas & Palacios, sp. nov. (white stars) and Pero atridisca Dognin, 1906 (squares) in Peru. Symbols: black square (locality type), white square (new record). Discussion The discovery of these two species of Pero confirm the importance of the arid environments of the Andes for the representatives of Group 15 of this genus, already highlighted by Poole (1987). The number of species of Pero of the Arequipa Department increases to three, as only one was recorded previously (Cerdefia et al. 2019). It is expect that additional species will be discovered with further sampling. As the Neotropical species of Pero appear to be highly specialized in host plant use 308 Carvos Pavacios et al.: Additions to Pero in Arequipa (Poole 1987; Vargas 2011), future surveys should be undertaken using light traps in underexplored habitats harboring different native plants to enhance the probability to collect more species of the genus with a better representation of the native flora in different sampling sites. Despite the importance of the knowledge of immature stages and natural history to the under- standing of ecology and systematics of Lepidoptera, these aspects remain poorly studied for the Neotropical representatives of Pero (Vargas et al. 2017). In order to gain insights in this regard, surveys for immature stages on native plants should be implemented, as detailed knowledge of geographic distribution and host plant use of these moths and other Lepidoptera (Farfan et al. 2020a, b) could be a useful tool to plan further studies dealing with conservation biology in the amazing arid environments of the Andes of southern Peru. Acknowledgements We thank Adriana Chalup, Antoine Lévéque, Axel Hausmann and Gunnar Brehm for kind comments on a previous version of the manuscript, Lafayette Eaton for checking the English. The first author would like to thank the Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa for financial support through contract number TP-25-2019-UNSA. References Brehm G (2017) A new LED lamp for the collection of nocturnal Lepidoptera and a spectral comparison of light-trapping lamps. Nota Lepidopterologica 40(1): 87-108. https://doi.org/10.3897/n1.40.11887 Brehm G, Hebert PDN, Colwell RK, Adams M-O, Bodner F, Friedemann K, Mockel L, Fiedler K (2016) Turning up the heat on a hotspot: DNA barcodes reveal 80% more species of geometrid moths along an Andean elevational gradient. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0150327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150327 Brehm G, Murillo-Ramos L, Sihvonen P, Hausmann A, Schmidt BC, Ounap E, Moser A, Mértter R, Bolt D, Bodner F, Lindt A, Parra LE, Wahlberg N (2019) New World geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometri- dae): Molecular phylogeny, biogeography, taxonomic updates and description of 11 new tribes. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 77: 457-486. Brown RM (2007) A new species of Pero Herrich-Schaffer 1895 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) from Mexico. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 83: 222—225. https://do1.org/10.3956/003 1-0603-83.3.222 Cerdefia J, Lopez E, Parra LE, Vargas HA, Farfan J (2019) First record of Pero rodriguezi Vargas, 2007 (Geometridae) in Peru with description of the female. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 73: 129-131. https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.7312.a7 Dias MM (2008) Novas ocorréncias e descri¢ao da fémea de Pero minetraria (Oberthtr) (Lepidoptera: Geomet- ridae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25: 373-375. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752008000200025 Farfan J, Cerdefia J, Arivilca M, Condori-Mamani M, Huanca-Mamani W, Vargas HA (2020a) First record of Alucita danunciae (Lepidoptera: Alucitidae) in Peru. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 55: 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2019.1702617 Farfan J, Lamas G, Cerdefia J (2020b) A new species of Mathania Oberthtr, 1890 from Peru (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Zootaxa 4758: 589-595. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4758.3.11 Ferris CD (2003) A new species of Pero from Wyoming and Idaho (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 142: 1-4. Herbulot C (2002) Huit nouveaux Geometridae d’ Amérique du Sud, d’Afrique centrale et orientale et d’ Asie du Sud-Est (Lepidoptera). Lambillionea 102: 451-458. Nota Lepi. 43: 301-309 309 Lévéque A (2006) Description d’un nouveau Pero du Mexique et compléments a la connaissance de P. fortunata herissa Lévéque, 2005 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae). Bulletin de la Société ento- mologique de France 111: 345-352. Lévéque A (2007) Description d’une nouvelle espece de Pero du Pérou (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 112: 389-394. Lévéque A (2010) Description d’une nouvelle espéce péruvienne du genre Pero Herrich-Schaffer, 1855 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 115: 51-57. Pitkin LM (2002) Neotropical Ennominae moths: A review of the genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zoo- logical Journal of the Linnean Society 135: 121-401. https://dot.org/10.1046/).1096-3642.2002.00012.x Poole RW (1987) A taxonomic review of the new world moth genus Pero (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Tech- nical Bulletin of the U. S. Department of Agriculture 1698: 1-257. Vargas HA (2007) Una nueva especie de Pero Herrich-Schaffer (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) del norte de Chile. Neotropical Entomology 36: 529-531. https://do1.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2007000400008 Vargas HA (2011) First host plant record for Pero obtusaria Prout (Lepidoptera:Geometridae). Neotropical Entomology 40: 625-627. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000100026 Vargas HA (2019) Female genitalia of Pero obtusaria Prout, 1928 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 63: 112-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2019.01.003 Vargas HA, Hausmann A (2008) Adiciones a la Fauna de Geométridos (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) de Chile. Neotropical Entomology 37: 167—168. https://dot.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2008000200009 Vargas HA, Hausmann A, Parra LE (2020) A new species of Macaria Curtis (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) from the Andes of northern Chile. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 64(2): e20200016 https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-rbent-2020-0016. Vargas HA, Oyarzun FX, Parra LE (2017) Egg and first instar of the Neotropical geometrid moth Pero ob- tusaria Prout (Geometridae: Ennominae: Azelinini). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 71: 50—56. https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v7111.a6